Given that thinking is what we theoretically do for a living,
how good are you at it?  Are you truly a "critical thinker?"

Two years ago I would have reflexively answered that of course I was
a critical thinker—I went to a college and law school you’ve
heard of, I am blessed or cursed by promiscuously wide-ranging
curiosity, and both my training in and practice of law and economics
meant I’d been honing my critical thinking skills all my career.

Then I started "Adam Smith, Esq."

And realized there was an entirely different plane of critical
thinking that I’d been missing out on.  What happened?  Simply
put, I started reading everything—well, OK, not counting Harry
Potter
—with a gremlin on my shoulder asking, "Does this
author make his case?  What are his unspoken assumptions?
  The implications he doesn’t run down?  Any internal
inconsistencies here?"  &c.  What changed was
I began to look at professional literature as potential grist for
"Adam Smith, Esq."—but as I hope you realize by
now, I never have and never will do a post which amounts to:  "There’s
something interesting; go read it."  Rather, I won’t post
at all unless I think I can critique, extrapolate, synthesize, or
otherwise comment intelligently.  And thus I came to inhabit
a new level of "critical thinking."

I tell this personal anecdote as a way of urging you to read this Harvard
Business Review
piece on this very topic.  Next time
you’re facing a decision:

  • Make sure you understand the logic, not just the emotions,
    behind your decision.
  • Specify what your assumptions are, then stress-test them; do
    they hold up?
  • If you’re unsure, collect some pertinent data; try to confirm
    or disprove them.  (This is hard, like playing both white
    and black in chess against yourself—you can’t tilt in favor
    of one or the other subconsciously.)
  • Consider the decision from different perspectives:  Is
    it really a zero-sum context?  What if you tried to offer
    more to get more?  Etc.
  • Never forget that human beings are involved, and that they
    will react dynamically, not statically, to what you’re contemplating.
  • Lastly, consider both the short and the long term.  This
    is another way of saying that you have to ask not just, "What?"
    but "What then?"  And "What then…?" 

It shocked me to experience how passively I used to absorb information.  And
now that I’m an "active" reader, I’m hungry to get better yet.  You
probably are, too.

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for the Insider’s Email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.