It’s not your imagination:   Mega-mergers in corporate-land
are on the upswing.  According to The
Wall Street Journal
,
the last five months have seen
more than a dozen deals valued at more than $10-billion.

And the result is that "investors quake."  The
sorry track record speaks for itself:  30% create added
shareholder value, 20% have no effect, and fully 50% destroy
value.  [One can bog down in an endless debate over whether
merger-hungry companies are already in trouble and looking desperately
for an exit door—which would mean the sample of mergers
is top-heavy with doom-laden firms—but we are looking at
empirical reality, not hypotheticals or a controlled double-blind
experiment.]

Given that the M&A and consolidation trend among the AmLaw 200
has emerged as a fairly consistent theme here, can we draw any
lessons from corporate-land?

The two Bain partners who wrote the Journal article
think so, and it’s worth a read: Their thesis is that "deal
success is not random."  And among the key leading
indicators of success are:

  • Is management experienced in deal-making?  Rookies have
    poor at-bats, and "by far the worst returns accrue to companies
    that do large, one-off acquisitions."
  • Will the acquisition strengthen the buyer’s core?  Deals
    with large operational overlaps tend to reinforce the resulting
    firm(s), but veering off in a new direction leads to a lower
    stock price (read:  diminished value) two years out 75%
    of the time.
  • Was real due diligence done?  On this score, take a
    look at the "masters" of deal-making, private equity investors
    like Blackstone Group or SilverLake Partners.  They assume
    nothing, including refusing to assume they know anything about
    particular businesses even in industries they know well.
  • Will management address integration immediately?  "Bad
    deals unravel during integration."  Recognize that
    integration must be speedy and comprehensive, and that one
    and only one "cultural acquirer" will emerge—not
    necessarily the buyer.
  • Finally, are you prepared for the unexpected?  If you’re
    not prepared for mid-course corrections, you may find yourself
    skidding towards the guard-rail with no Plan B.

If, as I believe:  (1)  M&A in law-land will only
accelerate; and (2) corporate-land M&A mortality statistics are
sobering, then this is worth pondering.  After all, "it’s
only business."

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for the Insider’s Email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.