Is CRM [Customer Relationship Management software] a
bridge too far for a firm?  This question is probably a tar pit
from which one cannot emerge unsullied with a single, unitary correct
answer, but as both the power of CRM applications and the competitiveness
of the landscape grow, it’s none to soon to ask this question about
your firm if you haven’t already.

The goal of CRM is breathtakingly easy to state:  To
make your business more client-centric.  What does that mean in
reality?  Among other things:

  • that from the inception of a relationship as a prospect through
    initial engagement and, we may hope, outwards to the horizon, information
    about the client (both "soft" and "hard") is captured and available
    to anyone positioned to deal with the client;
  • that fee earners see and understand with crystal clarity that their
    return for getting information into the system is repaid multiple
    times over once they have a deeper and more intimate view of the
    client’s needs and history with the firm; and
  • that information is recorded only once and only in one place.

Undertaking a CRM implementation, particularly in the culturally baroque
venue of an "eat what you kill" firm, realistically means a few additional
consderations:

  • keep it simple ;
  • do not try to do everything;
  • focus only on what key fee earners and decisionmakers need.

Typically, the key functionalities and pieces of information have
to do with the firm’s history with the client, who has interacted with
whom on what, and some rudimentary "segmentation" facility for assessing
at a very seat-of-the-pants level whether a client would be receptive
to an overture from another of the firm’s practice groups. 

As I said, CRM—perhaps like KM—has a blindingly simple
appeal.  So the devil is in the details.  But how irritated
have you been to call your credit card company about a billing question,
dutifully punch in your 16-digit account number (and maybe your zip
code as well), to be delivered to a noxious numbered menu of irrelevant
choices, at last to get the ear of a human being, and begin at once
by starting all over with your account number?  That system was
designed by a bank-centric, not a customer-centric, brain.  Don’t
do as they do.

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for the Insider’s Email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.