Jimmy Lee, 62, died last week of a heart attack after working out, at his home in Darien.

If that name doesn’t ring a bell, he was a vice chairman of JPMorgan Chase, where he had spent his entire 40-year career. He started right out of Williams College at Chemical Bank (later merged into JPMC) when its investment banking operations were so weak it was widely nicknamed “Comical.”  (Faithful readers will recall I spent many years on, in, and around Wall Street, and this was one of the stickier derisive monikers in the day.)

Here are some things said about him on the news of his sudden death:

  • “A pioneering deal maker and among the most influential Wall Street investment bankers of his era,” (Andrew Ross Sorkin, the NYT’s DealBook);
  • “Wall Street has lost one of its most quintessential figures—an archetypal investment banker who for four decades weathered booms, busts and changes in regulations by harnessing the art of deal making,” (the WSJ); and
  • “He was really a giant of investment banking and he was the first person to turn to for financing a difficult transaction,” Marty Lipton, the longtime corporate-deal lawyer, said in an interview. “When you had something that was really difficult, someone would say ‘why don’t you call Jimmy Lee and get this done.’” (quoted in the WSJ).

Nor did Jimmy fit the stereotype of the egocentric Master of the Universe focused on this year’s bonus and “what have you done for me lately?”

In 2001 his close friend Stephen Schwarzman, chairman and CEO of Blackstone, offered Jimmy the #2 job there. This was shortly before Blackstone went public and without doubt Jimmy would have become a billionaire.  They got all the way down to papering the transition, preparing mutual press releases, and were ready to pull the gun on the announcement in the morning. But Jimmy said he had to talk to JPMorgan’s CEO at the time, Bill Harrison, and after he did he called Schwarzman back to say he couldn’t do it. According to the NYT, Schwarzman “told him, ‘Don’t feel badly. You’re following your heart. He had so much loyalty to the bank and the people there.”

Jimmy kept the one-page term sheet of the offer in his top desk drawer at JP Morgan thereafter, showing it to friends and colleagues periodically to demonstrate his loyalty.

But that’s not why I’m writing about him.

I’m writing about Jimmy Lee because he was—if your measure is in terms of having an impact on the economy, business, and finance—one of the leading innovators of the past few decades. What he invented is something we take as commonplace today: Syndicated loans.

Syndicated loans, in turn, have become the rocket fuel for the private equity and hedge fund industries. Private equity and hedge funds have, you may or may not have noticed, virtually supplanted the traditional regulated banking industry as a source of capital for the economy. Estimates vary, but it’s believed private equity now provides twice to four times the amount of capital as bank-banks. Just last year (2014), according to Bain & Co., over $450-billion was distributed from funds (funds exiting investments, that is, and returning capital to shareholders) yet the industry still has an all-time record $1.2-trillion in freshly committed “dry powder.”

No, Jimmy scarcely did this single-handedly, but before syndicated lending as a common practice on Wall Street, only the clubbiest groups of banks would get together to ante up capital together for a loan. As Jimmy was quoted in Forbes in 2000, “We’re trying to get in the club, and they keep posting No Vacancy signs.” He worked around that, with a vengeance.

What Jimmy invented was not the notion of more than one lender pooling assets to offer a loan otherwise beyond their reach, single-handedly, but on-the-fly syndications, where some phone calls and a high degree of trust could assemble massive amounts of capital from a wide and diverse array of sources, within 24 or 48 hours, some contributing substantial proportions and some chipping in what they could, no club membership required. This is standard operating Wall Street practice today, but consider the vision it took to get there.

Glenn Hutchins, co-founder of Silver Lake Partners: “I would say that he took the private equity industry to scale globally.”

Jes Staley, former head of investment banking at JPMorgan: “He was probably the investment banker that most captured early the power of the buyout.”

What has this to do with law? In my opinion, plenty.

Jimmy didn’t innovate by “disrupting”—in the sense of supplanting or obsoleting—investment banking. He innovated by coming up with a way (syndicated loans fueling buyouts and private equity) that was a new way of doing what Wall Street had done all along, namely provide capital.

It seems increasingly the case to me that that’s also how innovation works in Law Land.

Shall we start with the observation that capital formation is not going away, nor is the rule of law?

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.