Lee Pacchia of Bloomberg Law recently interviewed me about some of the implications of “Growth is Dead.”
Here it is:
It’s 12 or 13 minutes but if you don’t have time for that we’ll be trying to cut it into bite-size snippets in the future.
by Bruce | October 12, 2012 | Articles, Compensation, Finance, Strategy | 6 comments
Lee Pacchia of Bloomberg Law recently interviewed me about some of the implications of “Growth is Dead.”
Here it is:
It’s 12 or 13 minutes but if you don’t have time for that we’ll be trying to cut it into bite-size snippets in the future.
Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.
What you can expect from us:
Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.
PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.
Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.
Very interesting interview and series
Well done, Bruce.
Thanks to both Andrew and Bill!
Bruce, fantastic appearance. And devastating.
Superb interview Bruce.
Question – why isn’t there more consolidation across the industry? Aren’t there just too many law firms?
Why is there the Big 4 in accounting, but a big 20-50 in law? That is an awful lot of partners’ time spent chasing deals off of each other, that could be productively billed. To say nothing of the pricing competition.
I expect there will have to be consolidation. If growth is dead, there will have to be given the expectations that PEP should only move in one direction.
Reader, the reason is conflicts. There are too many big clients suing each others’ subsidiaries all over the world and facing each other in all kinds of multiparty deals.