Does this sound like your firm?  IT is managed as one massive homogeneous lump, where the executive committee’s key concern seems to be managing (read: reducing) costs. 

Now, reducing costs (or increasing productivity, or mitigating risk) may be fine for "normal" IT operations—what can be characterized as keeping the lights on or having the trains run on time.  But if your IT department is a heads-up organization, and if your senior management appreciates the differentiation IT can, optimally, provide, there may be a better approach.

I call it the "portfolio" approach, and McKinsey analogizes it to venture capital.

Here’s what we both mean:  Not all IT investments are equal, just as not all financial investments in a diversified portfolio are equal, and there should be room for different approaches and different evaluative metrics depending on whether the IT project is:

  • Infrastructure support and maintenance (think wordprocessing)
  • Competitive "must-have’s" (think extranets)
  • Potential rule-changing applications (say, creating an ability for clients to generate their own standard documents on the fly, online, from your firm’s site).

And the evaluative criteria?

  • For infrastructure support, simple cost savings or productivity enhancements.  This is rather elementary; it either saves more than it costs, or not.
  • For competitive "must-have’s," net present value, or NPV.  Slightly more sophisticated, but your HP-12C can calculate it in moments.  The fundamental principle is that you get your money back, taking into account the cost of capital, within a timeframe you consider reasonable.  And finally:
  • For potential game-changers, the Venture Capital model:  Would we place a calculated bet on this, knowing that the outcome is highly uncertain? 

The first two are fairly easy, routine matters to manage.  But what about the third?

The key to making the "VC" approach work involves:

  • Unreserved endorsement and buy-in from senior management; a willingness and even an enthusiasm for experimenting on high-risk/high-reward initiatives.
  • A capable IT department within your firm (be brutally honest about this, and if you don’t like the answer you come to, be brutally honest about fixing it).  And
  • The willingness to understand that the "VC" model means you will experience both of the following:
    • Test, succeed modestly, refine, test, reinvest, test, succeed quite nicely, deploy; and
    • Test, fail, refine, test, fail, reinvest, test, fail, move on.

Not all IT initiatives are the same.  Buy yourself an IT "portfolio" instead of larding up all on Treasury bills or all on dot-com’s.

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for the Insider’s Email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.