CIO Insight often is a good read because, for my
money, they provide the clearest and most convincing links between
"hey, that’s cool!" technology and the delivery of hardheaded on-the-ground
value to management.  Well, they’ve done it again,
with an article entitled "The Rise of the Blog."  Oh,
no, you’re thinking, yet another bloviating article about blogs.  (If
that’s what it were, would I point you to it?  I hope by now we’ve
established some reasonable expectations of "trusted content" here
at ASEsq.) 

Rather, this looks at blogs—and the collaboratively-maintained
databases known as "wikis"—as
tools to enable coordination and project management among professionals.  Blogs
and wikis share several attractive characteristics:

  • they’re dirt-cheap, even free ;
  • magically intuitive to non-tech people (perhaps the strongest extant
    analogy was the ease of adoption of email) ;
  • changes and updates are instantly available to anyone with online
    access (and, if appropriate, a username and password);
  • since both have built-in RSS/subscription functionality, users
    can receive updates automatically without having to remember to go
    back and check (possibly to come away empty-handed); and
  • with their search and categorization tools, they can grow
    up into powerful knowledge-bases over time.

Human nature gravitates to things with "no instructions required," and so it should come as no surprise that
corporations from Lucent to Sun Microsystems have seen employees migrating
away from massive and kinky project-management and collaboration tools
dutifully installed and maintained behind the firewall to blogs and
wikis started spontaneously by individuals and small groups.  As
a technology director at Sun says, more than somewhat ruefully:  "Collaborative
design groups are using wikis on their own, because they get lots of
function with low complexity.  It’s like pens and paper—you
don’t have to tell people what they can do with it.”

Back to law-firm land:  How about wiki’s on key clients?  On
judges that seem to keep showing up?  On practice sub-specialties
(§1031 exchanges, say)? 

Too flaky for your firm?  If that’s your
reaction, are "pens and paper" flaky?  Email?  Blogs
and wikis are among the new tools in the technological arms race.  Are
you going to let your competitors steal a march?

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for the Insider’s Email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.