So this has nothing to do with the economics of law firms, but
it has a lot to do with professional behavior under incentive regimes.  Two
economists at the University of Chicago have published a paper analyzing whether realtors (representing the seller of a home)
work as hard on their client’s behalf and extract as much value
for a home as they do when they’re working for themselves, selling
their own home.

Have you already guessed or shall I tell you?  As competently
summarized by The
New York Times
, in a study of nearly 100,000 home sales over
ten years (1992—2002) outside Chicago, realtors selling their
own homes typically kept it on the market 9.5 days longer and secured
a median price 3.7% higher than a comparable home for sale by you
or me.  Unprofessional?  A breach of duty to the client? 

Not
so fast:  Because of the commission structure, there is truly
little in it for the realtor to hold out very long for a better
offer that may, of course, never come.  Although the standard
6% commission is, in my opinion, scandalously high and prima
facie
evidence that the National Association of Realtors constitutes
a cartel, the seller’s individual realtor only gets one-quarter
of that 6%, or 1.5% (their half of the half that goes to their
firm). 

So for a $500,000 home, the agent would get $7,500—say,
for 10 days’ work.  Now suppose they could add 3.7% to
the price by working for another 10 (OK, 9.5) days.  The house
would now sell for $518,500, and their net gain in income for doubling
their efforts would be $277.50.  $7,500 or 10 days work or $7,777.50
for 20 days?  But when selling their own home they of course
get to keep at least 95.5% of the incremental price (assuming 1.5%
still goes to their own firm and 3.0% to the buyer’s realty firm).

Now comes the important part:  Recall that this particular
10-year period spans from pre- to post-internet.  Pre-internet
(1992—1995), the difference in favor of the realtor’s own
home was 14 more days on the market and a 4.9% higher price.  Post-internet
(2000—2002), the numbers shrank to a 2.9% higher price and 2.5 more
days on the market.  Thank you, realtor.com!

Something similar (see below)
is happening to the mainstream media courtesy of the blogosphere:  The
cartel’s power is under siege from newly-widely distributed data. 

Don’t you hate it when your
information advantage starts to be eroded?

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.