Case Study / Compensation Redesign

AmLaw firm’s compensation system was at odds with its new strategic direction

Key Issues

Our client realized its outdated compensation system was an obstacle to the successful implementation of its recently adopted strategic plan which emphasized collaboration and cross-serving.  The outmoded plan rewarded individual effort for both origination and working on matters; clearly not an equilibrium situation!  Further, the old plan had so many criteria (over 20) for financial recognition as to be meaningless and confusing to the partnership. 

We were asked to start with a clean sheet or paper with an eye to thoroughly updating their compensation system.

Actions

Following a review of the current system, the firm’s financials and strategic goals (and researching all available sources on the breadth and variety of approaches to partner comp), we recommended a two-part program that would engage the partnership and build consensus and buy-in for a plan going forward.

First, we conducted one-on-one interviews with a majority of partners and key business professionals to gain a nuanced understanding of what the partnership was seeking and was capable of –  also giving them the opportunity to “vent” if necessary.

Using inputs from the interviews, we then conducted a planning workshop with key players at the firm.  This included an exercise where the group “force-ranked” those elements they felt most consequential for the firm – and, thereby built consensus around key aspects.

With all that, and our deep understanding of law firms, we developed a novel plan that supported their current strategic priorities but allowed for flexibility should those priorities evolve.  The plan recognized financial performance and collaboration and, importantly, subjective contributions for positive, “firm first” behaviors and good citizenship (mentoring associates, raising the firm’s profile in the community, transitioning clients from older to younger partners) – without which firm’s lack sustainability.

Since the comp process can be an onerous “time suck” for many, we recommended the process be undertaken every other year rather than annually and that discretionary bonuses/penalties be used in the “off” years.

Results

The firm will be moving to the new system following one “hybrid” transition year. Supporting the strategic plan’s principles through the mechanism of compensation has renewed the partnership’s commitment to the new way forward.

learn more about Adam Smith, Esq. & compensation +

Publications

Contact

Bruce MacEwen, President
Email
direct: +1.212.866.4800
mobile: .+1.212.866.2630
New York

Janet Stanton, Partner
Email
direct: +1.212.866.4270
New York

Sign-up for email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.

Join +

X

Sign-up for email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.