The third concern had to do with firms’ resistance to innovation and technology:

  • “That lawyers stubbornly refuse to use technology and other innovations to improve the legal system.”
  • “Innovation – both doing it and getting clients interested in it.”

Beyond these main themes, several important issues were raised:

  • “Balancing partner income expectations with the reality of a tough economy/legal environment.”
  • “Correctly identifying lateral partner hires.”
  • “Attorneys being hired to do professional staff roles – even with no training – to replace a staff person with years of experience.”
  • “Globalization”
  •  “How best to deal with unproductive partners.”
  • “The glass ceiling.”

From a junior partner:

  • “I also have real concerns about whether the leadership’s incentives are really aligned with my own.”

We heard this concern from a few associates:

  • “Finding a path forward when I’m not sure I want the life-sucking grind of staying on partnership track.”

Editorial comments

Nearly half (46%) of you provided suggestions for new articles or deeper examination of topics.  The only prevailing “negative” is that many readers wanted more posts!

A very few of the very positive comments (think Bruce may be blushing!):

  • “Your columns are brilliant, I pass them along regularly.” [Ed. note – please continue doing so!]
  • “Love all that you do, but particularly your discussion of the legal recruiting process and associate compensation.”
  • “It is intellectually stimulating and provides great food for thought.”

More importantly, you offered some very helpful ideas for future articles—many of which you’ll see going forward.

Some asked to see more articles addressing issues at a wider range of law firms:

  • I would appreciate more emphasis on the middle market law firm.
  • You could use a somewhat less New York-centric attitude to the practice.

Other ideas included:

  • “Suggestion that you provide insight from more of the general counsel/client side decision makers as there appears to be message confusion at times about what the clients want – price, predictability, insight, etc.
  • “Most of your content is geared toward senior management.  Understandably so.  But the young partners and senior associates who are the next generation of leadership are dealing with the new realities as well, and obviously have much longer time horizons.
  • “Could do some analysis on the success (or lack thereof) of firms that have made concerted efforts to expand internationally.
  • “More on blowing up the canard that all AMLAW 100 firms are equal.

Again, thanks for participating in the survey.  You provided valuable insights on how to make the site stronger and more responsive to you, our readers.

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.