My article in the May 2005 print edition of Law Technology News is
now up.   It’s
essentially a recap of my coverage of the keynote address where I
served as “blogger-in-residence" at the recent CIO/CTO Conference,
co-sponsored by ALM and Harvard Business School Publishing.  

Succinct
take-away:  The possible models for IT Governance are:

• Business monarchy (this is highly efficient but can lead to
suboptimal IT architecture).

• IT monarchy (leads to superb IT architecture and procedures
but may not align with business processes).

• Federal system (IT, practice groups, office heads, etc., all
have input — far and away the least efficient and most likely
to generate the worst overall decisions).

• Duopoly (business leaders suggest what they need, IT responds
with what they can provide, and a genuine dialogue occurs: typically
a smart choice).

• Feudal (partners get what they want).

• Anarchy.

In general, the federal model is the least effective, because it is
the most time-consuming and bureaucratic. On the other hand, it’s the
most open in terms of input (democratic) and difficult to avoid in
a law firm culture.  Duopoly is the optimal choice.

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.