A trend emerging, I believe, from the competitive landscape is that
the AmLaw 100 are "pulling away," competitively, from the AmLaw 101-200.
  So when a star among the "second 100," like Boies-Schiller, misses
a calendar deadline that goes all the way up to the 9th Circuit, attention must be paid. 

More interesting from the perspective of this blog is the debate articulated
by the judges:

“In the modern world of legal practice, the delegation of repetitive legal tasks to paralegals has become a necessary fixture. Such delegation has become an integral part of the struggle to keep down the costs of legal representation,” Schroeder wrote.
But Judge Alex Kozinski, who was joined by M. Margaret McKeown and Pamela Ann Rymer in dissent, would have none of it.
“While delegation may be a necessity in modern law practice, it can’t be a lever for ratcheting down the standard for professional competence,” Kozinski wrote. “If it’s inexcusable for a competent lawyer to misread the rule, it can’t become excusable because the lawyer turned the task over to a non-lawyer.”
“The error here — whether made by the lawyer, the calendaring clerk or the candlestick maker — is inexcusable.”

There you have it, courtesy of the 9th Circuit: Is, indeed, the tradeoff
between the modern and integral necessity of keeping down costs and
dumbing down professional standards?  This is a debate the last
of which we have not heard.

My answer, in case you asked, is that technology will enable even-higher
professional standards (cf. the ability of pharmaceutical software
to pick up on dangerous drug interactions without human oversight)
while also bringing down costs, certainly for commodity issues like
making filing deadlines.

Related Articles

Email Delivery

Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to your inbox +
X

Sign-up for email

Be the first to learn of Adam Smith, Esq. invitation-only events, surveys, and reports.





Get Our Latest Articles Delivered to Your Inbox

Like having coffee with Adam Smith, Esq. in the morning (coffee not included).

Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information
Oops, we need this information

Thanks and a hearty virtual handshake from the team at Adam Smith, Esq.; we’re glad you opted to hear from us.

What you can expect from us:

  • an email whenever we publish a new article;
  • respect and affection for our loyal readers. This means we’ll exercise the strictest discretion with your contact info; we will never release it outside our firm under any circumstances, not for love and not for money. And we ourselves will email you about a new article and only about a new article.

Welcome onboard! If you like what you read, tell your friends, and if you don’t, tell us.

PS: You know where to find us so we invite you to make this a two-way conversation; if you have an idea or suggestion for something you’d like us to discuss, drop it in our inbox. No promises that we’ll write about it, but we will faithfully promise to read your thoughts carefully.